A judge denied Meta’s motion for a directed verdict on May 14, allowing the State of New Mexico’s case against the company to proceed. The decision came during phase two of the trial, where New Mexico is seeking a finding that Meta created a public nuisance and is requesting relief requiring the company to address alleged harms caused by its platforms.
The case matters because it addresses whether large technology companies can be held accountable for potential negative impacts on children using their platforms. Judge Bryan Biedscheid ruled that Meta had not met its burden to halt the proceedings, ordering that the trial continue as scheduled.
Attorney General Raúl Torrez responded to the ruling by saying, “Today’s ruling is a significant signal for New Mexico families and a clear rejection of Meta’s attempt to avoid accountability. Instead of making meaningful changes to keep children safe online, this corporate giant continues fighting to protect its business model at the expense of kids’ safety. That is disgraceful. The Court made clear today that this case deserves to move forward, and we will continue fighting to hold Meta accountable for the harm its platforms are causing to New Mexico children.”
The Office of the New Mexico Attorney General serves as chief legal officer for the state and provides services across all counties in New Mexico. It coordinates with local law enforcement agencies for public safety efforts and advances justice through civil litigation and criminal prosecutions, according to the official website. The office also fosters trust through community outreach initiatives while seeking to protect consumers and uphold rule of law.
Observers will be watching closely as phase two continues in court. The outcome could have broader implications regarding how social media companies are held responsible for alleged harms linked with their products.
